
Taking good photos isn’t really as hard it seems, well once you get it down! If you have seen my work (Andrew Fashion Photography), this will be the kind of work I am going to explain. I have been shooting for almost a year, and built up a good solid reputation. I like to consider myself leaning towards the Fashion and Glamour type of photography. And I will be sharing my lovely secrets with everyone today! Why? Cause I am nice, and anyone who is interested in becoming a fashion photographer really does not pose any threat to me. There are a few things I would like to mention though. As with any art form (usually), to create a good movie, you need great software, great equipment, etc… Right? The game has changed in our little world now, in my honest opinion, I know longer think it’s all just “The Photographer,” (well to an extent it is). Hand Patrick Hoelck a $50 Point-and-shoot camera, and compare his shots with Richard Reinsdorf and his $8000 Canon 1DS-Mark II w/ his $50,000 lighting setup (kid you not, that’s not much in lighting –just imagine video). Now I don’t want people thinking, wtf is Andrew talking about, “It’s all the Photographer!” Okay yes, this is definitely an arguable subject, a lot of it can do with just the photographer, but anyone who is interested in the area of photography can become just that with practice! Anyone can take good pictures with just the sun and a normal camera yes, but there is a huge difference when it comes to Fashion and Glamour, a huge difference. Open up any Fashion magazine, and you will see what I am talking about, if you don’t… Every photo has exceptional lighting, well at least every photo should if it’s in a fashion magazine ;). And this is what were going to be discussing today. Now I am going to try to break this up into what I feel are very important aspects of taking photos, very important… This is a freestyle blog, keep this in mind, so I might tend to get things out of order, lol.
The first things I analyze “before” shooting:
Now, those are seven important factors I always consider, always! All seven of those go through my head before I shoot, and I mean every single one. Have I found a spot? How do I want to light it? Do I need to test shoot it first? Does she do makeup or do I need an artist? Can she do hair? Does she have outfits? Do I have assistants? Can she model? Now if you have people to help you through this, teamwork can really let you focus on what you want to do. What do you need to focus on? Say it with me, “LIGHTING!” Lighting is one of the most imporant aspects in fashion/glamour photography, so important that I can’t even stress it enough!
Lighting 101

I have read many books, practiced many times, and kept with it (another form of practice). If you have read up to this point I assume you enjoy photography, so keep reading! I haven’t taken any classes for photography, but I have read many books and spent countless hours getting experience behind the camera. With all of that studying and practice under my belt, I could probably write an entire book on lighting and techniques, as well as the science behind it. I have had experience with two professional photographers (real ones, yes) and of course my own experience. I have literally been around the block with photography. And as of right now (during this writing), I still shoot for the 3 biggest clubs in Downtown Denver (Colorado). Lighting comes from practice. Anyways, since I don’t want this to be a book, I am going to say what “I THINK”, and I will post really good resources as well.
Hot Lights - Do NOT use them! End of story. You can study about them all you want, but they are basically lights that stay on consistently and get very, very HOT. They are impossible to use with a good selection of modifiers and very obnoxious.
Flash/Strobes - This is about 99.99% of what fashion photographers and myself use, and yes, there is a reason. The same reason Formula 1 drivers race with Ferraris. Bad analogy? I don’t know. But it’s the truth, you use what will get the job done beautifully and correctly!
Modifiers - There is an entire dictionary of terms for modifiers, but I always use: Soft boxes, Umbrellas, Grid Spots, Reflectors, Beauty Dish, and Gels (these are what create colors -the cheaper way). There are many more modifiers I have not listed simply cause I don’t really use anything else.
There are so many other tools, and terms, but I am just here to get you on the right track. And I probably will be posting a lot more Fashion Photography blogs! Hehe. Quality of light is key, you cannot create beautiful images with bad light, you have to face the facts. You can buy a “Strobe Kit” for as cheap as $250. My first set was an Interfit kit with two flash heads, a softbox, and some other stuff, for that cheap of a price! I think it was around 150 watts maximum output or something to that extent. In other words, really cheap and very powered. There are so many variables when it comes to strobe lighting, if your not familiar with strobe lighting, they are just really, really big versions of on camera flashes (haha), but seriously. With strobe lighting, you have your maximum power (watts), how bright the strobe can get, you have your flash duration, recycle time, and other features like: built in receiver (which is nice), modeling lamp which is very helpful, and so on. When preparing to buy your first strobe kit which is what I strongly recommend, their are two ways you can go. Monolights and Battery Powered, that is how its “generally” broken down. Monolights typically plug into a wall (I like to call them studio lights, for in the studio, in the house, whatever…), but I always prefer battery powered. You can take them anywhere! I love to shoot studio and on-location. I am a huge fan of shooting anything I can, be it, sets, outside, whatever! But… One thing… Battery powered strobes can be very pricey. If you have the money, this is where you should throw it! At the end of this article I will provide links of what I recommened, what I use, and what I wish I had :).
Some quick lighting tips I use

Low f-stops:
Low f-stops? What does this mean, an f-stop is just the measurement of the “Aperture.” F/2.8 simply means the aperture is at it’s widest opening possible. Okay, let me break it down even more. Aperture is basically the eyeball of the camera, to any of you geeks out there, yes I can break this down even more, but were trying to keep it simple! You know when you wake up and go in your bathroom, turn on the light, and you can’t even open your eyes cause it’s so bright! And it’s just your light bulbs! That’s cause your eyes adjustment was at f/2.8 (meaning your pupil was at it’s biggest point), can anyone finish the puzzle? A butt load of light went through your pupil! Your pupil was at it’s biggest state! So remember this, f/2.8 = big pupil. Now when your eyes finally adjust, your eyes might adjust around somewhere to maybe f/11 (pupil is getting smaller, the higher the number), I don’t know, but the pupil gets smaller! Now imagine an f/32, your pupil is very small, meaning you are barely letting light in through your eye! So back to the main topic, “Low f-stops.” Wait, there is another symptom to low f-stops… f/2.8 is not only a huge pupil letting a lot of light in, it also plays a huge role in depth of field. I know, I am sorry, so many terms coming at you. It entertains me how all of this just intertwines, sometimes drives me nuts
haha. What is an easy way to explain depth of field… Okay you know when you see the photos of a person, specifically a portrait photo usually (chest up or something), the background is entirely blurred. The trees are 100% out of “focus.” This is what we call depth of field. If that shot were adjusted to f/32, those trees would of been practically crystal clear! I hope this is making sense, I am trying to make these easy to understand :). There really is a lot more variables that can make a huge difference to this, such as the distance the subject is from the background, how far your zoomed in with the lens, all of these variables make a change to how f/2.8 responds. But you will always experience a dramatic “out of focus” effect when shooting at f/2.8 (Yes there are exceptions to this, such as shooting an extremely close photo of an eyeball, face, whatever… But you get the idea!) Back to topic, I love low f-stops because of the out of focus effect, when doing close up photos of make up, I like to blur everything around the makeup, maybe blur the hair when shooting closeups of the face, all kinds of things you can do with the “out of focus” effect, which in proper terminology is “depth of field.”

Over power the sun:
This is what I call it, and pros as well use this terminology. This refers to going on location with very powerful battery powered lights (1200 watts+) and shooting in bright daylight with strobes, sounds kind of funny huh? Here is an example: One and Two. These were days I had a towel over my head cause I couldn’t see the screen it was so bright. Man I look funny shooting with a towel over my head… So let me try to explain how this works so it’s easily understandable. Depending on how powerful the sun is at any given time, the required settings could be ALOT different, but if I were shooting during the day with harsh sunlight aka natural lighting. For example this photo was taken at the same exact time as photo #2 above! What made the difference was the LIGHTING! How on earth did I get those completely different photos with lighting? Well the shot with only natural lighting had an f/2.8 aperture (hence the out of focus background! Wow it’s coming together finally!), and probably a shutter speed of about 1/2000 of a second. Did I lose you, or are you quite aware of what shutter speed is? Okay, there is a technical definition and Andrew’s definition to help give you a real idea of what it does. We’ll leave the tech specs for the articles I list at the bottom
k? Good, great! Shutter speed is what determines how “LONG” the light can come in for. Shutter speed determines how long light is allowed to come through the lens. EX: If you look at the sun for 5 seconds, and than close your eyes, you just had a shutter speed of 5 seconds! One more real world example! You wake up in the morning with f/2.8 pupils (very big pupils a.k.a your letting a lot of light through your eyes), so recap with me real quick. The f-stop/aperture (same thing) determines how big the entrance for light to enter into your pupil is! You walk into the bathroom blinded with your eyes still open, just pretend you kept your eyes open and stared into the mirrior for 5 seconds. You just took an f/2.8 aperture, 5 second shutter photo! Now obviously that photo would come out “over exposed,” also known as completely blasted in whites, can’t even tell who’s in the photo! Making sense yet? Back to the main topic… Hmmm…. Oh ya, 1/2000 second shutter speed, do you know fast that is? That is fast! So that photo had a very big eyeball (f/2.8) and very fast shutter speed (not letting light in for very long) which produced this photo!.
Now the “over power the sun” photo is a different technique all together. I blasted my strobes to full power, maybe around 1100 - 1200 watts of power, so every time I snap a photo, I get 1200 watts of light bursted onto the model. This happens seriously in a fraction of a second (hence the name strobes). The best way to explain this is, if I am shooting the model with 1200 watts of power, and the flash head is back maybe 6 feet with a really big softbox (a type of modifier that diffuses light a bit to soften it up), that is a lot of light blasting the model. So in order for the photo to not be to “over-exposed,” I cannot be shooting at f/2.8, she would just be extremely over-exposed. So that photo was probably shot at an f-stop between f/18 - f/22, which is making the pupil a lot smaller, which means the light in the sky, the light from the sun isn’t entering the pupil as much, because the pupil is so much smaller, which in the end makes the sky appear “DARK.” And in the end, the strobe lights up the model great too, giving the over power the sun effect. Now with strobes, you do have a flash duration/sync speed, so you cannot be shooting at 1/2000 shutter speeds! With the lighting setup and camera I use, I have a max shutter speed I can go up to which is 1/200th of a second. Huge difference in shutter speed. But the insane difference from f/2.8 to f/22 compensates. If you shoot the photo with a 1/60th shutter, you will see a dramatic difference in “ambient light/natural light” enter the camera aka the clouds, the sun, the sky will brighten up big time. If I took the shot at 1/200th shutter speed, the sky would appear practically dark, that is how much a difference the f-stop and shutter speed can make. Now you might be asking, does this effect the model? If you keep the strobe at the same distance, same power, the shutter speed will hardly effect the strobe on the model, the strobe is so fast, the strobe is just a flash of light, the shutter has nothing to catch after that… It doesn’t end right there… A good rule of thumb.
- Aperture will make a dramatic difference on the strobe lighting (lighting within a close spectrum)
- Shutter speed makes a dramatic difference on ambient lighting (sun light/natural lighting)
Cameras 101

The good ole camera, about time right? I shoot with a Canon 5D, 12.8 megapixels, it works… But I would like to have a Canon 1Ds Mark II, which is about $7000. I am going to be blunt and honest on how I feel. I am not a Nikon guy, the only good Nikon is the D2XS in my opinion (unless we get into film, which were not), okay I should probably back my reasoning up. I have used everyone Nikon out there, D70S, D200, and the D2XS which are the main “3″ from Nikon. The D70S and D200, don’t even think about it your looking into high fashion (You will end up spending a lot of time in PS). Nikon users can argue me here, but these cameras are old technology and based off an old CCD chip also known as the sensor which captures the data. I have compared various D70’s, and D200’s to my old Canon 20D, and it just was not happening for me. The color was horrible compared to the 20D in my opinion. The 20D uses a quality CMOS sensor. Feel free to research this if you would like. If you use the D70S, or D200, look forward to a lot of Photoshop, the color is not that great. Now don’t get me wrong, it’s all personal preference RIGHT? Well I just told you mine. The D2XS is Nikon’s top camera right now running around $4000 without a lens. My 5D tops the D2XS I think, and my camera is only $2539 without a lens (sorry if I use the word “only,” that might be some big bucks for some people, but in the fashion world, it’s not a dime…) Anyways, the top dogs are Canon, Nikon, and Hasselblad (to expensive). I am being blunt and to the point with my opinions, I love everything about Canon’s, they are usually more expensive than Nikon though… Anyways, here are so important terms to know when getting ready to buy your first camera:
DSLR:
“Digital Single Lens Reflex.” The type of camera you should be using. Basically, the sensors and so on are glass, which in the end gives much better quality than point and shoot cameras. You don’t have to use Digital, FILM is just as beautiful as well, I love FILM. But 95% of the time I use my DSLR.
Megapixel:
8mp, 12mp, 21mp. This all determines how big the photo can really get. In a nut shell, the bigger the better. Now I know some people might totally disagree with me on this, but let me explain my reasoning. With DSLR cameras, you have a quality sensor inside the camera (SLR). The more megapixel, the more data you typically capture, the more data you capture, the more you can work with. With a point and shoot camera, the concept is the same, but you are not using an SLR sensor. Technology now is becoming very intelligent though, so the theory is becoming true. “The more megapixel, the better.” That use to a be a joke, but it’s almost true now? Anyways, with SLR cameras, no matter what… You are not buying a bad camera, SLR cameras are great.
Full Frame:
It means the camera doesn’t have a multiplying factor, which means you see the entire image. All film cameras are full frame. If you attach a 70mm lens to a film camera, that is what you will see. If you attach a 70mm lens to a Canon 20D with it’s 1.6 multiplying factor: 70mm x 1.6 = 116mm. You wont be seeing the image at 70mm with the Canon 20D, you will be seeing it as if it was like a 116mm! My 5D is full frame, so a 70mm lens is exactly as it would be on a film camera, 70mm! In another sense, you are capturing more data with full frame. (As I hear, things might be changing, I’ll be sure to keep everyone updated.)
Multiplying factor:
As I said above, if the camera has a multiplying factor, it is not full frame. Most Canon’s have a multiplying factor of 1.6, Nikon’s have one of 1.5. There is nothing wrong with this, you can still take great photos, just another fact to consider.
ISO:
The sensitivity to light, ISO ratings can usually be from 50 up to 6400. 50 being not sensitive, 6400 being very sensitive. The values go up like so: 50, 100, 125, 160, 250, 320, 400, 800, 1600, 3200, 6400 (something like that, heh).
White Balance:
This setting allows you to adjust how the camera “interprets” light, how the camera reads the color white. This can make huge difference on your photos and will determine if you end up in Photoshop all night or not. If you don’t master proper color, you will be fixing it in Photoshop. I always avoid this, I like my photos to come out perfect so very little Photoshop is needed.
Aperture/f-stop:
This was heavily explained above in layman’s terms. The aperture defines the size of the opening in the lens. F-stop is simply the physical rating (f/2.8 - f/32). A smaller number means a bigger opening and less depth of field (very blurry background). A bigger number means a smaller opening and more depth of field (non blurry background).
Shutter Speed:
A shutter speed is how long the actual shutter in the camera stays open while taking a photo. If you ever heard the term long exposure, it means somehow who took a photo that lasted 30 seconds or more. The shutter stays open for 30 seconds and more gather light the entire time.
* There are many more terms, but were getting you in the right direction, remember?
Lenses 101

Every article I have read, everything I have ever heard says invest your money in lenses. I am sorry, but I strongly disagree with this. I mean yes, a good lens will help and make a difference, but so will everything else. I just do not believe in that theory at all. What I am getting at is everything is an important part of Fashion Photography, but the equipment (camera and lighting) is the real difference. The equipment is what will make your photos, not the lens! Lenses do play a huge role in macro photography though, but not fashion. If any other photographers disagree with me, I am sorry, feel free to argue it in my comments. I do use the best grade lens for my camera, but have also used the standard plastic lens that came with my camera. When shopping for lenses, you want a glass lens, just remember that. Stay away from plastic. There are many terms when shopping for lenses: Prime, Zoom, Focal length, Macro, f-stop range, filter size, minimum focus distance, etc… Canon and Nikon both have their technology stamped on lenses too! Which makes it even more difficult shopping for lenses. For Fashion Photography, if you are just starting, I would recommend a Zoom lens for sure! Since I am firm believer of Canon cameras, I recommend trying to invest in an L-series lens (top of the line, glass grade), but non L-series lenses are just fine!
Canon
Canon has their own technology built into their lenses, I strongly advise reading about it on their site than me trying to explain it, it’s really not a big deal, and somewhat self explanatory. But here are their basic tech specs.
L: Canon will sometimes have the Letter “L” at the end of some of their lenses. Like this Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Autofocus Lens. The “L” means it is their professional series lenses. Meaning, it is the Rolls Royce of their lenses, lol.
EF: Interchangeable with Canon film and DSLR cameras. Try to buy EF lenses.
EFS: For use with only Canon DSLRs, cannot be used on Canon film cameras, I don’t like these because you can’t use them on film cameras!
USM: Ultra Sonic Motor, which is their actual hardware running all the motors, doing the work inside the lens when your zooming in and out to take beautiful photos :).
IS: Image Stabilzation. Self explanatory right? Helps prevent hand shaking to keep your photos as clear as possible!
Nikon
Nikon has their own technology terms as well. They have great lenses too, here are what some of their terms mean when shopping for lenses.
– SOON –
Feel free to fill me on this anyone who probably knows more on Nikon than me ![]()
– SOON –
Basic Terms
Filter Size: The size of the opening at the top of the lens, this will determine what size filters you can put on your lens.
Prime: A prime lens means the it is only one specific focal length such as 70mm, 105mm, 50mm, and so on. You cannot zoom in and out. They say prime lenses give better quality than zoom lenses, but that is old news now. Zoom technology is becoming so advanced, I would just invest in Zoom.
Zoom: The focal length can be from 20mm - 70mm, or 70mm - 200mm, etc… It allows you to zoom in and out so you have more flexibility when taking photos.
F-stop range: Sometimes lenses will show an f-stop such as f/1.5 or sometimes they will give a range like f/2.8 - f/3.5. This just tells you how long of an f-stop you can achieve with that lens. If the lens has a “range,” it simply means you might not be able to achieve f/2.8 depending on the settings with your camera.
Minimum focus distance: This is how far you can stand from the subject in order to achieve crystal clear focus, if you stand any closer, you will have a very hard time and sometimes impossible to get a clear photo.
Conclusion
Okay, so now you have all this information, but what do you do now? This was a lot of information at once, and seriously just the beginning, I will have more articles in the feature if the responses to this I receive from this blog are positive. You can take all this information and do nothing with it OR you can make use of this great material. A quick synopsis would be:
So in fashion photography in my eyes, a lot of it comes down to your desire to shoot it and the equipment. Yes, anybody can start in the fashion industry if you love it, if you have an eye for it, but it all comes down to: “Do you want to do it? Do you enjoy it?” If yes is the answer, than you are capable. If your budget is low, no worries, their are plenty of decent equipment out there for an “affordable” price. You can start off in the fashion game with relatively low budget Canon camera, and get very pleasant results! I had a 20D and it did wonders! They discontinued the 20D and brought in the 30D which cost $995 for the body only. If that is to much you can pick up a Canon Rebel which is great as well. But I am going to have a huge list of resources like I have been mentioning this entire article. But where your money should go is in lighting, you can pull ANYTHING off if lighting is done correct, trust me. Don’t have studio back drops? If you master lighting, you can use a normal wall and achieve almost similar results, although paper is not expensive ($40 a roll, which last for over 6 months for me –even longer if you take care of it!). Lighting, lighting, lighting… If you need your subject in pitch black, and don’t have black paper and a studio, guess what? You can do it with proper lighting and camera settings in the middle of a field! Open areas work best for achieving the look of somebody in pitch black like this photo. Need somebody in pure white without a studio, like this photo. You can do it if your lighting is done properly using a white or beige wall! So without further ado.
What we have discussed.
Topics to be discussed in newer blogs.
My Secret Resources & Final Suggestions
Okay so your still will left with all these great tips, but you know what I hate, is when people write amazing articles but leave you hanging! You know exactly what I am talking about, they don’t tell what is good, and why! As Albert Einstein once said “The secret to creativity is hiding your sources.” I guess I am about to blow that quote out of the water? I am going to leak you all of my secret information, equipment I use, equipment I would die for, and what I recommend starting with if you have a low budget.
Lighting Equipment
Modifiers I use:
I use this Beauty Dish a lot.
And this Softbox a lot.
And of course, the famous Ringflash.*
* The ring flash is a very popular solution for fashion photography, you can use it practically in any situation and achieve amazing results. I use it on studio, I use it out doors, it’s a lot more efficient to use than setting up a softbox and having a Grip hold the softbox in the wind the entire time. The ring flash is what creates the halo shadowed effect around people, and the famous halo circle in your subjects eyes. Here is an example although not my best, just don’t have my recent work up. This Photo.
I hear a lot about Alien Bee, a lot of good things. You can check them out here. I have never personally used them, but they are very inexpensive.
Camera and Lenses
Now if you get the Rebel XTi, it comes with a lense I recommend you use till you get some decent lighting, but if you need a cost effective lens to use with your 30D, there are great lenses out there! A good lens to start with would be this Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Autofocus Lens. I feel it’s important to get a zoom lens with flexibility from wide angle all the way up to portrait. There are plenty of lenses on BH, all you have to do is shop around and ask questions!
Great Sites
Inspirational Photographers
Final Words
I just want everyone to keep in mind, that everything I say and think are what I think based on my personal experience and knowledge gained from practice as well as other people. There is absolutely nothing wrong with Nikon, cheap strobes, etc… You can still take GREAT photos with a D70s and Smith Victor Strobes. But everything I say is in reference to QUALITY, I am giving out all the secrets the pros use, and how it is achieved. Do you think a Pixar film was creating in iMovie (Cheap software) or Avid/Final Cut/Premiere (Thousand dollar software)? Laugh out loud. I am not of fan of Nikons, they do have great cameras, and as I hear Nikon is coming out with a new amazing camera the D3. I haven’t heard much about it yet, so I have nothing to say about it at this point. If anyone has any questions, or just need some tips or feedback, LEAVE A COMMENT! I am happy to help anybody out!
And please realize this is “Fashion Photography 101″ meaning the first post, more to come, and obviously 101 means the basics, I haven’t even touched further subjects or advanced lighting!
Popularity: 100% [?]
31 Responses
Mark Teicher
September 11th, 2007 at 5:22 pm
1A. Your comment about Nikon is a bunch of crap. Smith Victor Strobes are not even close to what one can get using Alien Bees and their wireless transmitter/receivers for studio. For car shows/motorcycle shows, utilize a Nikon SB-600/Nikon SB-800.
I own several different Nikon cameras ranging from the Nikon D2XS, D200, D40, D50, D70, D70s, D80. Canons are highly overrated, and their .cr2 to .jpeg converter is for the birds, Adobe Photoshop CS2 or Adobe Photoshop CS3 is at minimum a standard tool one should have in their arsenal.
BHPhoto has ok prices, and they have a cadre of equipment available, as does Cameta Cameras out of Amityville, NY. Nikon has a D300 being released in November, not a D3. Before you post information, verify your facts first.
Based on your personal experience, I have seen some great shots taken with a Canon 5D, and some lousy pictures taken with one.
SmugMug is also a website, you completely missed, Flickr is crap for professional photographers.
For modeling sites
http://www.onemodelplace.com
http://www.modelmayhem.com
http://www.modelplace.com
Also you forgot to mention Ansel Adams, Gary Fong and Ken Rockwell for good in-depth reviews of cameras, accessories, etc.
I purchase professional backdrops from Amvona out of Mansfield, MA. My lighting system is from http://www.alienbees.com, good equipment for good money, not overly expensive.
Some of your photos are excellent, some has issues, it all depends on the particular set, location, etc. Environmental variables and personal attributes of a model are always will be a factor in taking great pictures. If one is spending an enormous amount of time photoshopping pictures, then something is wrong in your location setup and lighting.
Adobe Photoshop is designed to reduce one’s workload not increase it. There are some great add-ons/modules to photoshop that can automote about 75% of what you state above.
There are some great books on Adobe Photoshop for Digital or Film Photographers, where are those references.
/m
gurov
September 11th, 2007 at 6:28 pm
2some nikon stuff for ya:
Nikkor: they make lenses !
VR: vibration reduction, same as IS
ED: extra low dispersion, lens elements that help reduce chromatic aberation, these will be placed in the high end lenses
IF: internal focusing, basically same thing as USM, something that will be somewhat foreign to canon world these days, nikon still has a couple of lenses (that i like) that the body actually drives the focus mechanism in the lens, i.e. no motor in the lens for focus. benefit is that IF lenses you can focus at any time by just rotating the ring, while NON-IF lenses you have to disengage the drive (lever on the body) lower models of the nikon cameras don’t have this motordrive, but these are the cheaper bodies. for example, my 70-200 f/3.5(4?)-5.6 VR lens cost me only $350, and it is amazingly sharp and VR helps. It’s not IF, so there’s a slightly annoying whir when it focuses, but once it’s focused the lens takes superb pictures as opposed to my 28-120VR 3.5-5.6 VR ED-IF, which cost me $650
DX: dx format lens, which basically means the lens is made for the 1.5-1.6x crop, it will be cheaper in price but you could not take it to a full frame camera, which up until very recently has not been an issue, but with the announcement of the D3 full frame 12MP CMOS camera , d3’s pricing is around $5k (d300 has also been announced as CMOS-based at a pricepoint of only 1700-1800 for the body !) this is same as the EF vs EFS
the canon vs nikon debate(canonite vs nikonian) is a long and heated one, a lot of people believe that fashion photographers shoot canon while news/press photographers shoot nikon, it’s really just which camp you land in and what you become used to. colors that come out of the camera can be corrected ,my D70 had the option of using custom color curves to modify images as they were being shot, at the time when drebel was missing a rudimentary spot-meter and continuous auto-focus was only on iso400 in “sports mode”.
nikon has its own color quirks that once are worked around can yield great results.
I personally like the nikon stuff, partly cause i’m used to it, partly cause the interface really sucks on the canon cameras, the menus are very much cryptic and resemble a point-and-shoot cam a lot.
Saad
September 11th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
3That was one bad-ass article Andrew!
I love photography but I’m only an amateur and try to make my photos look creative as possible with consumer cams. Though I plan on purchasing a canon DSLR very soon. (most likely the rebel xt - since I’m only 16 and can’t afford the big stuff at the moment :])
I’ve been wanting to understand a few things here and there but was always a bit confused. Your article covered most of it up and the explanations were great! I look forward to more from you.
Quick question, is it true that if you zoom into your object that you’re shooting and have that low f stop, the depth of field would increase? I’ve heard that when it comes to filming, but not sure about photography.
Here’s just a bit of my “play-around” photography:
http://saadmalik.deviantart.com/
Rock on!
-Saad
Andrew Fashion
September 11th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
4Alienbees are great, thanks for reminding me! Totally forgot about that company, this was all freestyle like I said in the beginning. BTW, this is dedicated towards Fashion which is why I don’t bring up on-camera flashes “YET” until later articles.
Andrew Fashion
September 11th, 2007 at 6:52 pm
5Thanks man! Glad you like it! And yes, zooming makes a huge difference on the depth of field, it’s actually incredible!
Jordan
September 11th, 2007 at 8:35 pm
6Very insightful, but I didn’t agree with the fact that people need a make-up artist or hair stylist, I have always done my own hair and make-up and it looks the same as if someone did it for me.
Other than that great article. Keep it up.
Arianne (AMA graphix)
September 11th, 2007 at 9:21 pm
7Wow… thanks for this. No wonder your move up the ladder has been so quick. I plan on reading this and reading it thouroughly. Thanks Again. Good Stuff.
Russell
September 12th, 2007 at 6:19 am
8Wow… I definitely think I can do this. I’ve been into Fashion for a while, and I’d love to do Fashion Photography. Now with this, I actually understand how its done, pretty much. When I read about it online from other sites, I couldn’t understand, and I got lost easily. But with how you put things here, its very easy to understand, this is really nice. Thanks Andrew, I appreciate your effort to explain it, and a great effort at that. You should also put an article out about how to make your own clothing, I know you do it, with your PerfeXion Apparrell company, and I like the stuff you make with it. I wanna do stuff that makes Medieval Times logos or designs on shirts, pants, hoodies… the whole nine yards, but make them very fashionable, if you have any tips for me, or anything please refer them to my email address, thanks man.
russ@comfortable.com
Dana
September 12th, 2007 at 8:25 am
9Good stuff as usual Andrew. The Canon/Nikon debate will never go away, but I completely agree with you. I second the vote for Alienbees, if you’re on a budget theyre great. Anyway, like I said, great writeup!
Joseph Azzariti
September 12th, 2007 at 2:28 pm
10In response to Andrew’s artical:
Don’t forget all the help you got from many different people when you were learning photography. If it wasn’t for all of them you’d still be struggling with the mechanics and probably still be using hot-lamps. lol
In response to Mark:
Yes, Nikon has a D300 coming out in November. But Andrew is correct about the release of the Nikon D3. Theres a review Here on DP Review.
In response to Saad:
The DOF doesn’t technically change, yet at the same time it does. Since you’re “zooming” in on the subject the DOF fades a lot faster, thereby making it seem as if its gotten smaller.
Andrew Fashion
September 12th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
11Thanks gurov! Might add it to the article and give you credit
GINA R B
September 12th, 2007 at 5:48 pm
12CONTACT ME please ! Out of every forum I have been to for starters, this is the only one that bad any sense to me. I need alot of help with lighting ! I bought a new camera 2 weeks ago and I am the most impatient person in the world. Of course I want to learn everthing overnight…not gonna happen - I KNOW. I have a few questions and would love for you to email me if you could. I have modeled for 7 yrs and finally decided that I want to be on the OTHER side of the camera. It always looked so easy…dang was I wrong.
Contact me if you would !
I appreciate your help SO MUCH!
GMALIAH@YAHOO.COM
Chris
September 14th, 2007 at 9:39 am
13I can appreciate the time you spent on this article. Good work.
I was 2 days out from placing an order for my profoto equipment when I came across alienbees… and now I’m quite torn between. lol.
I know that there is not much of a comparison between profoto and alienbees, however, upon doing some research on alien bees and reading some reviews and testimonials I think I’m going to give ‘em a shot. FAR less expensive, and the warrantys offered with them are excellent.
As far as the Nikon/Canon/Sony debate, it’s kinda retarded. Most dslr’s and semi-pro dslrs are so competetive in todays market that most differences are found in the type of lenses used. It’s all a matter of preference. It’s totally just a green vs red apple debate. If you have time… check out http://www.cameralabs.com and read up on their reviews. They leave no stone unturned. Pretty good website for some information for beginners and experts alike. They even do a 10 megapixel “shootout” test where they compare the competetive entry level dslrs side by side.
Anyway, back on topic… great article. I’m sure you have helped alot of new photographers understand alot more then they might have known before.
Joe Jackson
September 14th, 2007 at 1:17 pm
14Wow! Definitely a good read, and I will be digging this for sure.
Andrew Fashion
September 14th, 2007 at 8:59 pm
15Glad you liked, let me know how those alienbees are!
Daniel
September 19th, 2007 at 5:14 pm
16I couldn’t understand some parts of this article on Photography 101 - Andrew Fashion, but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.
Tasha
September 20th, 2007 at 9:31 pm
17Thanks for the info I was just looking into getting some studio lighting and this article has helped quite a bit. Not only did you leave great info but you you gave direct liks that actually worked lol. Many sites have links that no longer work. I will be utilizing this info very soon thanks for your time.
mj
September 23rd, 2007 at 8:50 am
18A very, very enlightening article. Thanks for the very good read.
Looking forward to future posts!
Daniel
October 1st, 2007 at 1:19 am
19I have to say, that I could not agree with you in 100% regarding on Photography 101 - Andrew Fashion, but it’s just my opinion, which could be wrong
Wahoo
October 6th, 2007 at 12:04 pm
20Thank you for sharing!
David
December 28th, 2007 at 8:19 pm
21I read it three times so far and wow, I cant wait to try the outdoor lighting. Thanks.
ILZE
February 16th, 2008 at 7:12 pm
22Just wanted to say…. came across some good tips here….. and i think you did a pretty good job covering the basics…. as faras Canon/Nikon debate… I’m on the Nikon side…. and I’m happy with it… just got my D300… still getting to know it better….. and on alienbees… I like their products I have alienbee 800 and investing soon in ringflash… they have great kits too…. anyways…. keep posting..
Sunny Wright
April 22nd, 2008 at 4:26 pm
23Thanks for taking the time to share your experiences and findings. I love, love, love the look of your photos and would like to apply much of that look to my target market (seniors) for a fresh new look and this article gave me some interesting things to try. Off to shop for ABee battery packs. (Cripes…more money!) Seriously…thanks.
Sunny Wright
April 22nd, 2008 at 4:28 pm
24By the way….are you planning some info with flash? My flash is being wasted on my lack of knowledge.
Krystle
April 30th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
25Hello!
I am new to photography and I really found this article useful.I am on a very tight budget so the only things I have right now are some work lamps and a canon power shot s5is.I am saving right now to buy a better camera and would like to stick to canon only because I have really enjoyed this camera.My first camera was a nikon.It was okay.Anyway I am doing a photo shoot on the 11th and the only thing I am using is natural light and an old burnt down house as my backdrop.I am kind of nervous about it because I am very particular about how my pictures come out.I started out as a makeup artist/hair stylist and worked my way into photography.I was just wondering if you could give some tips for natural lighting.I really want to get into high fashion photography.Also how did you go about getting your work noticed?
Thanks again!!
Krystle
myspace.com/krystlerae or http://www.modelmayhem.com/KePhotography
Thanks !
David Webb
May 11th, 2008 at 5:41 am
26Nice post, did enjoy reading and watching it :), keep up the good work you are good photographer
you can hang out on site i have with alot of quotes!
Chris
June 9th, 2008 at 7:27 am
27thanks for the article.
Joshua
June 16th, 2008 at 7:57 pm
28hi, thanks for the tips, really help… I’m about to get 1 profoto B2 (very soon, decided after read your article)
I still not sure to get the ring flash or just another head
I’ve using canon & nikon cameras, both are great.
For canon I like 5D is the best, well for Mark II or Mark III its a nice camera, but very pricey… i rather get D3 (which I’m using now)
its true that previous nikon D100 u have to PS alot lol, D70 less PS than D100 hahahha, but lightroom adobe helps a lot anyway.
Andrew Fashion
June 20th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
29No problem people, I need to write a follow up here soon!
sandeep
June 24th, 2008 at 5:04 am
30Andrew.. you wrote a lenghty article with positive advices and also negative.
Nikkor cameras and lenses are widely used by photographers. Most pro use Nikon. Regarding your scarry comment on CMOS sensor, i went into google to find the technical details and non-tech. What I found is CCD sensor is much much better than the CMOS in terms of color, pixels and image quality. CMOS is good for buying camera in cheaper price, less weight, and less battery consumption. CMOS will takeover CCD someday, not time is yet to come.
Lens do make quality in pictures. Nikkor 50mm f1.8 mm lens quality of photos and features are lot different than nikkor 18-135mm lens @ 50mm keeping same aperture value.
Dan
July 15th, 2008 at 10:32 am
31Hello everyone I would like to see if anyone would comment on this site perfectionapparel.com? I was wanting to see if you liked what products they have to offer in the line of Fashion, Designer T-shirts, and anything else that seems relevant pleas.
Thanks,
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Categories
Archives
Links
Meta
Calendar
Recent Entries
Recent Comments
Most Commented
Andrew Fashion is proudly powered by WordPress - BloggingPro theme by: Design Disease